India Law Chronicle Logo
Notifications
Home

Supreme Court Directs Compliance Report and Lists Matter After Seven Months

Copy LinkShareSave

A bench of Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice K.V. Viswanathan heard Writ Petition (Civil) No. 295 of 2012 filed by S. Rajaseekaran against the Union of India and others, along with miscellaneous applications including IA No. 50798/2025, IA No. 43387/2025 and IA No. 119142/2024; Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, senior advocate, appeared as amicus curiae in the matter. The hearing concluded with pronouncement of a reportable order on 7 October 2025.

The Court directed implementation of the directions recorded in the reportable order and ordered periodic monitoring of compliance. The central outcome was that the Registry would list the matter for review after seven months to receive a compliance report and note further progress; the Court also directed urgent listing of two interlocutory applications upon mention. The Court, in its reasoning, observed: "Various directions have been passed as contained in the Reportable Order. The Registry shall list this matter once again after a period of seven months to report compliance of our directions and further progress in the matter." The order further recorded: "Upon being mentioned by Mr. Kishan Chand Jain, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent(s) seeking urgent listing of IA No.43387/2025 & IA No. 119142/2024 respectively, the Registry is directed to list the said IAs on 17-11-2025."

Background The petition was instituted in 2012 and proceeded as a public interest litigation listed before the Supreme Court's PIL-W section. The short pronouncement recorded that "various directions" were issued as part of a reportable order without setting out detailed operative directions in the brief record of proceedings placed on file. The Registry was directed to relist the matter after seven months to enable the parties and the Court to report and assess compliance and further progress. Counsel for the petitioner included Mr. Krishna Kumar (AOR), Mr. Vinodh Kanna B (Adv.) and Mr. Shivang Thapiliyal (Adv.). Multiple respondents were represented by Central Government and other senior and standing counsels; Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee and Ms. Aishwarya Bhati appeared as Additional Solicitors General, and Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav and several other counsel appeared on behalf of respondents. The order recorded that IA Nos. 43387/2025 and 119142/2024 would be listed on 17 November 2025 following a mention by respondent counsel. No earlier appellate or High Court reasoning was set out in the short order, and the pronouncement confined itself to issuing directions, fixing a compliance-listing timetable and directing urgent listing of the specified interlocutory applications. The matter will return to the Court's roster for a compliance report and further directions after seven months; the interlocutory applications are to be listed on 17-11-2025.

Case No.: Writ Petition(Civil) No.295/2012 Case Title: S. Rajaseekaran v. Union of India and Ors. Appearances: For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Krishna Kumar, AOR; Mr. Vinodh Kanna B, Advocate; Mr. Shivang Thapiliyal, Advocate. For the Respondent(s): Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR; Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, A.S.G.; Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G.; Mr. Viresh B. Saharya, AOR; Ms. Prerna Mehta, AOR; Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari, Sr. A.A.G.; Mr. Kishan Chand Jain, Advocate; and several other counsels appearing for various respondents.